Templates
Here are some great sites that have free templates for GP Vaccine Refusal, School Covid Letter, Refusal of Facemasks in the workplace, Exemption from masks in schools, Refusal of entry no mask complaint, Decline of PCR test in the workplace & schools, Notice for business owners, Vaccine Liability, Covid Vaccine refusal for caregivers, children and the workplace, Decline of Laterial testing in school & the workplace, Deregistering a child from school, and many more.
Helping Hands Group Support - HERE
Consent - HERE
Power to the People - HERE
Democracy Declaration - HERE
Solutions Empowerment - HERE
A huge Thank You to all the people & organisations that are out there offering (especially Free) information and resources.
If you have any links that could benefit this site, please get in touch, join my group and like my page on Facebook, great to connect with like minded and not so like minded people.
----------------------------------------
I have taken various information and facts from numerous resources, and put this together
Please feel very to use any part of this and edit to suit your needs for School or the work place.
To whom it may concern
I would like to pass on my concerns with regards to the following: -
I believe that it is my daughter’s/son’s body, and she/he is of an age to decide for herself/himself what should be inserted or injected, and at the very least everyone tested, and parents/carriers should be made fully aware of many of the facts that I reference herein before making an informed decision.
An important point to note here is reference to “clinical signs and symptoms”. Such “signs and symptoms” are clearly absent where there is mass testing of pupils who have NO symptoms.
The WHO Notice cautions about the danger of using high cycle thresholds to produce a positive result. In general, high viral loads (from an infectious person) are detected at low cycle thresholds. Conversely, a low viral load will only be found from running the test at a high cycle threshold and a positive result from such tests is unlikely to mean that the patient is actively infected or infectious.
In conclusion, neither the lateral flow test or the PCR test is suitable to mass screen healthy, asymptomatic children to determine who is infected or infectious. False positive results will be used to justify the unnecessary isolating of hundreds of thousands of children and denying them access to their schools and education.
Informed Consent must be a prerequisite to testing. Whilst the Government have recognised the need to obtain consent for a test, I am concerned by the statement that testing will be “strongly encouraged”. Furthermore, I am aware that some schools have already indicated to parents/careers that all children will have to be tested before they are allowed access to school.
Informed consent, whether by the parent/career for the pupil, or the pupil under the Gillick principle, has, by law, to comply with the following principles:
1. You should be free to accept or refuse treatment that is offered.
2. Your decision should be voluntary and must not be influenced by pressure.
Your decision must be respected. (Harriet feels that she will be bullied or left out if she does not conform, my job as a responsible parent is to research and try and make Harriet aware of this vital information)
3. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free, and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be expressed and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
Any attempt by the Government or School to “strongly encourage” a test is a direct breach of the above, as consent must be “free” and “voluntary”. “Strongly encouraging” a test is clearly intended to put pressure or coercion on the parent/career or the pupil to have a test.
Informed consent by the individual is a requirement for all medical screening programs, as the risks and harms to the individual, resulting from both false positives and false negatives, are real and significant.
Furthermore, requiring a pupil to have a test before being allowed back into school is in direct breach of the requirement for informed consent. Attaching such a stringent condition, means the consent is not “free” or “voluntary” and amounts to coercion.
Any school requiring tests to allow pupils back to school is directly interfering with the right to “free” and “voluntary” informed consent, which is a direct violation of the pupil’s right to bodily integrity and/or personal autonomy, and thus constitutes an abuse.
I would also respectfully draw your attention to the school’s and each teacher’s duties towards all pupils whilst on their premises and/or in their care. Those duties include, inter alia, the duty of care at “common law” and various statutory duties which provide that teachers have a duty of care towards pupils under their supervision, which includes promoting the safety and welfare of the children in their care. This level of duty is classed as being that of a 'reasonable parent'.
I believe that requiring a mask and test to come back to school is a breach of the duty of care, as pupils are being forced to have an invasive and uncomfortable test, which can be a distressing experience.
Especially as the testing swabs are sterilized in Ethylene Oxide, Hydrogel and agarose gel electrophoresis on the swab. Although, this is to maintain that as much viral transmission stays on the swab as possible, these chemicals are also extremely dangerous to be putting in the mouth and the nasal passage where it has the possibility of leaking into the blood brain barrier. Ethylene Oxide which has been labelled a Group 1 Carcinogen, the most potent form of cancer causing chemical. As well as this major health hazard, there are other detrimental side effects from short term exposure to ethylene oxide which include eye and upper respiratory tract irritation, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, dizziness, malaise, fatigue, muscle weakness, and signs and symptoms of peripheral neuropathy.
I would also respectfully draw your attention to the UK medical instruments manufactured by AlphaLabs, MWE and Chromonics have all been found to contain Hydrogel and agarose gel electrophoresis on the swabs. Although, this is to maintain that as much viral transmission stays on the swab as possible, these chemicals are also extremely dangerous.
It is known that lateral flow testing is extremely unreliable -“University of Birmingham and Scottish universities suggesting that the lateral flow tests had a sensitivity of just 3% (the proportion of people with covid-19 who tested positive) and that 58% of the positives were false positives.”
As well as being very unreliable, it is not even a medically accurate form of testing. “Previous data from the Liverpool mass testing pilot program found that lateral flow tests detected just 48.89% of covid-19 infections in asymptomatic people when compared with a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. It also found that the Innova Lateral Flow SARS-CoV-2 antigen test failed to detect three in 10 cases with the highest viral loads.” A minister at the Department of Health and Social Care admitted that mass swab testing was “not an accurate way of screening the general population” and could provide false reassurance.
A team of scientists at the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics have concluded that children are not the main drivers of the pandemic after carrying out a systemic review of more than 47 separate studies. The same research also stated that children are unlikely to infect their families or teachers which has been backed up by a huge study of 10 million people on asymptomatic transmission, published in the British Medical Journal which concluded that asymptomatic transmission of covid-19 didn’t occur at all.
The average age of a Covid death is 82, there has not been a single case of a child who was not already profoundly ill that has died ‘WITH’ Covid-19, let alone ‘from’ in Britain. I see absolutely no reason whatsoever to continually subject children to continuous and invasive testing, especially when they are not exhibiting any symptoms of illness.
In another study by Public Health England, published in the British Medical Journal, it states - “The absence of strong evidence that asymptomatic people are a driver of transmission is another good reason for pausing the roll out of mass testing in schools, universities, and communities.”
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON MASK’S
The Government has FAILED to conduct a Risk Assessment of the risks to the individuals of the public for the harms caused to them by mask wearing- or wearing a face covering.
Without such a Risk Assessment, the individual is NOT providing “informed consent” to wear a “medical device” (which a mask is as defined under the Medical Devices Regulations 2002).
A face “covering” falls to be regulated under the Consumer Protection Regulations. The Face Coverings Regulations are therefore - prima facie - unlawful and should not be enforced.
Face Coverings Regulations are ultra vires the Government’s powers, but that legal argument is ongoing.
Anyone being asked to wear or use a medical device - such as a mask - should be medically assessed by an Occupational Health team for their INDIVIDUAL risk posed to them by wearing a mask.
Failure to conduct a Health & Safety Risk assessment is both a civil and a potentially criminal offence.
Therefore, both the Government and the Schools - and anyone else enforcing mask mandates in the absence of a full Health & Safety Risk assessment to an individual -, is acting unlawfully and can be held PERSONALLY liable for the damage caused to the individual.
Legal challenges are already being run against the “mask perpetrators” to challenge this unlawful and harmful mask mandate and cases are already being won, and damages for harm caused paid out.
If a “mask perpetrator “has not followed the law in forcing you to wear a mask, criminal investigations can follow under Health & Safety laws.
It is a breach of both the right to privacy and the Equality Act 2010 to ask for medical evidence in this manner.
Masks worn by the public in community settings, do not prevent transmission of a virus particle as tiny as SARS-CoV-2: that is what the scientific research evidence shows.
Masks can INCREASE the risk of transmission if not face-fitted and fit-tested for the individual wearer as leakage occurs.
Masks can INCREASE the risk of secondary bacterial and fungal infections due to incorrect putting on and taking off the mask, incorrect storage, and lack of sterilisation of the contamination collecting on the surfaces of the mask.
These contaminates are then inhaled: the moisture and humidity of the mask is a perfect breeding ground for bacteria and fungus which multiply in the mask fibers.
A German children’s charity has commissioned a laboratory to examine a commercially available mask, the face mask was previously worn by a child in school for eight hours. Examination findings detected 82 bacterial colonies and four mold colonies.
These are then inhaled deeply into the lungs where they multiply further, along with the loose fibers of the mask which collect in the lungs.
Secondary bacterial lung infections are a major risk factor from inhaling bacteria into the lungs. Secondary bacterial lung infections were the major cause of death in the Spanish Flu. They had cloth mask mandates then too. See a correlation??
Masks cause multiple organ damage - some of which is irreparable and permanent.
Masks cause social, cognitive, emotional, and psychological harm too.
Have YOU been fully informed of all the harms that wearing a mask causes to YOU??
Therefore, I am declining this on medical and ethical reasons, which I do not need to divulge, but as you can see above, the science is overwhelmingly against these testing and mask strategies.
I would also like to draw your attention to Classrooms below the legal minimum temperature – contravention of HSE Act 1974. School is breaking the Health & Safety Executive (HSE) Act 1974 whereby all Schools must follow the same health and safety rules on compulsory indoor temperatures.
In a classroom which has all its windows open thereby causing the classroom temperature to drop below the minimum temperature laws i.e. The law states “In a normal, indoor environment, the temperature should be a minimum of 16 degrees Celsius”. The classroom is below the minimum temperature which is in contravention of the HSE Act 1974.
It is a known recognised fact given by the Government that the Coronavirus thrives in cold conditions and it is also a known medical fact that the human body’s immune system is significantly lowered in cold conditions, thereby causing my child to be at increased risk of catching the Coronavirus and/or other virus's which can infect people with lowered immunity due to the cold temperatures.
I wish to remind you that all Teachers, Governing Body, and the Local Education Authority are bound by the laws governing room temperatures of classrooms and to adhere to a general duty of care to its pupils. The school must by law ensure the health, safety, and welfare of all pupils (as far as reasonably practicable), this also extends to protecting children from hot and cold extreme temperatures – the school are acting negligently, irresponsibly and are endangering my child’s health and safety as a result of allowing classrooms to be extremely cold and in contravention of the HSE UK Laws.
I do hope that in the light of the information I have presented herein that you can see my concerns and thus given you food for thought.
Whilst my child is at school, I will not have concerns about keeping her/him safe and free from harm. A school is a place of education and I would like to remind you again that it is illegal to refuse a child education based on declining to be tested or wearing a mask.
Let it be known that “I am just doing my job” will not be permitted as a reasonable excuse for enacting state tyranny on the very youngsters you are supposed to guide and protect. perpetrators will be held to account.
Please could you inform me who will be taking full financial and medical liability for any illness or injury that could occur from any test or wearing a mask?
Useful resources:
www.worlddoctorsalliance.com www.new.awakeningchannel.com www.life-and-truth.com www.greenmedinfo.com
If you, or you know of anyone whom is thinking of having the vaccine’s I would urge you strongly to take a look at these resources first and also research using search engines such as Bitchute and Rumble as google owns youtube which is heavily censured which begs the question as to why?, however The Observation Deck on youtube if still available is a great resource. www.rense.com www.tapnewswire.com www.cvpandemicinvestigation.com
Sincerely, and without vexation, frivolity, or ill will, or in any way intended to deceive whatsoever and, with all my Common law unalienable Rights reserved.
Kind regards
Thank you for visiting my site. I hope you can get something from it.
I also hope that you can also appreciate my time and the costs of running this site, I am not funded by Bill & Malanda Gates, nor any other government or corporation bodies.
My time on research takes me away from earning and time with my family and friends, however I believe strongly in getting the truth out there. I have and will continue to make many sacrifices personally, and financially to get this information to you, and only if you are able to do so, or feel led to, and please there is absolutely no pressure or obligation, as I will still carry on with my mission. Even the cost of a coffee would be very much appreciated. But like I say please do not feel like you have or need to.
To donate please go HERE